03 · Analyse risk · Public sector

Map the lifecycle and actors

Focus on unequal access, unchallengeable decisions, supplier opacity, inaccessible notices and weak reason-giving.

PUBLIC SECTOR WORKING CONTEXT

Assess public accountability risk

The organisation exercises public functions and must support equality, accessibility, reason-giving, procurement transparency and accountable review.

Evidence bar

Equality impact analysis
Accessibility test results
Reason-giving and appeal evidence

REVIEW CHECKPOINTS

Lifecycle & Actor Map

Write harms for individuals, groups and public trustRecord consultation or accessibility gapsDefine launch blockers for accountability failuresDo not make the AI system an ownerSeparate provider and deployer dutiesInclude affected residents, not only direct users

INTERACTIVE REVIEW MEETING

Pressure-test your reasoning

Product leadMarketing claim

The supplier calls this ‘an intelligent platform’. Is that enough to classify the system and its actors?

Write at least 40 characters to reveal the review criteria.

Risk leadBoundary challenge

What surrounding software, people and suppliers are part of the governed AI system?

Write at least 40 characters to reveal the review criteria.

Lifecycle & Actor Map

Complete the fields against the public sector operating context. Your work saves automatically in this browser.

AI lifecycle map

Write at least 20 characters of your own answer to unlock the review guide.

Actor responsibility map

Write at least 20 characters of your own answer to unlock the review guide.

Training versus inference

Write at least 20 characters of your own answer to unlock the review guide.

Responsibility gaps

Write at least 20 characters of your own answer to unlock the review guide.

Loading saved answers…