Restoring your saved mode and lab work…
Human involvement is meaningful only when the reviewer has time, authority, information and competence to challenge the system.
A score can look objective even when its assumptions are flawed. A reviewer who routinely accepts it is rubber-stamping, not providing meaningful oversight.
Review relevant evidence and limitations.
Override, escalate or stop the process.
Create an auditable decision trail.
Define the human decision point, candidate protections and the evidence required from the provider.
Write at least 20 characters of your own answer to unlock the review guide.
Answers save automatically in this browser.